Skip to main content
main content, press tab to continue
Article

What’s the minimum I can do and still comply with SB 261?

By Lisa Lipuma | September 9, 2025

California’s SB 261 requires large companies to disclose climate-related financial risks by 2026, aligning with TCFD, prompting cross-functional coordination and potential resilience planning.
Climate
N/A

California’s SB 261 requires large companies doing business in the state to publish a report on their climate-related financial risks and risk management strategies by January 1, 2026, and every two years thereafter. If your organization earns over $500 million in annual revenue and does business in California — even without being headquartered or incorporated there — this law likely applies to you.

The law mandates disclosure aligned with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework. But what does that mean in practice — and how simple can your effort be while still complying?

The bare minimum

To meet the legal threshold, your disclosure must include a description of:

  • The climate-related financial risks and opportunities that are material to your business, including both physical risks (e.g., wildfire, flood, extreme heat, sea level rise) and transition risks (e.g., regulatory changes, shifts in consumer preferences, technology developments).
  • How you identify and assess these risks: You must consider short, medium and long-term timeframes and multiple climate scenarios
  • The business impacts of material risks and opportunities, metrics used to assess them and any associated targets.
  • How the organization will govern climate-related risks and opportunities, and how it will address or mitigate climate related risks.

You can put the disclosure on your website as a PDF. You may also need to put a link to the disclosure document on a Calfornia-hosted register. No third-party assurance or quantitative modeling is required.

Is the minimum enough?

While this “check-the-box” approach may be sufficient for compliance, it comes with trade-offs. Without deeper analysis, many companies miss critical insights into how climate risk could affect their capital planning, insurance strategy, or long-term resilience. Legal, EHS and risk teams may struggle to prioritize adaptation actions or defend the adequacy of risk management to boards, investors, or regulators.

For some companies, starting with a light-touch approach and expanding over time may be appropriate. But even basic compliance requires coordination across functions and credible documentation. SB 261 may be a reporting obligation — but it’s also a signal to build climate risk into the business conversation and plan for long-term resilience.

Why you might want support

Climate risk disclosure is still a relatively new requirement for many companies, and SB 261 introduces added complexity given its alignment with TCFD. Even for organizations aiming to do the minimum, practical questions quickly appear: What qualifies as a “material” risk? How do you tie climate impacts to financial performance? How much documentation is enough — and how do you avoid creating legal exposure?

Support can help ensure alignment across internal functions—legal, EHS, risk, sustainability — and provide access to established frameworks, market benchmarks and technical data that streamline the process. In many cases, external partners can complete assessments faster and more cost-effectively than in-house teams. For example, WTW’s climate tools and proprietary data sets can quickly identify location-specific physical risks and model financial impacts — saving significant time, reducing internal burden, and improving the quality of results.

For companies looking beyond basic compliance, expert support can also help evaluate CapEx and OpEx exposure, run scenario analyses and prioritize resilience investments in line with enterprise strategy.

Whether your goal is to meet baseline requirements or build a more future-ready risk program, external perspective can help make the process more efficient, credible and actionable.

TCFD requirements

  1. 01

    Governance

    Disclose the organisation’s governance around climate related risk and opportunities

  2. 02

    Strategy

    Disclose potential impacts of climate related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy and financial planning

  3. 03

    Risk management

    Disclose how the organisation identifies, assesses and manages climate related risks

  4. 04

    Metrics and targets

    Disclose the metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate related risks and opportunities

Assess business impacts

Impacts on:

  1. Physical asset portfolio
  2. Operating costs
  3. Revenues
  4. Supply chain
  5. Business interruption
  6. Clients
  7. Employees
  8. Stakeholders/investors
  9. Liabilities (prod./D60)

Manage risk and strategy

Responses might include:

  1. Change to business model
  2. Portfolio mix
  3. Investments in capabilities and technologies
  4. Proactive internal and external stakeholder engagement
Framework showing climate-related risks and opportunities under low, medium, and high emissions scenarios, highlighting transition, market shifts, reputation, policy, and physical risks.

This chart highlights climate-related risks and opportunities. Low emissions scenarios involve market, reputation, and policy challenges, while medium and high emissions scenarios emphasize acute and chronic physical risks.

Risks and opportunities vary by climate scenario, with transition risks in low emissions pathways and physical risks in medium to high emissions pathways.

This chart highlights climate-related risks and opportunities. Low emissions scenarios involve market, reputation, and policy challenges, while medium and high emissions scenarios emphasize acute and chronic physical risks.

Disclaimer

WTW hopes you found the general information provided here informative and helpful. The information contained herein is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice and should not be relied upon in lieu of consultation with your own legal advisors. In the event you would like more information regarding your insurance coverage, please do not hesitate to reach out to us. In North America, WTW offers insurance products through licensed entities, including Willis Towers Watson Northeast, Inc. (in the United States) and Willis Canada Inc. (in Canada).

Author


Head of Enterprise Risk Consulting, North America

Related content tags, list of links Article Climate Risk
Contact us