Private equity (PE)-owned businesses face unique challenges, particularly in managing their retirement plans. These organizations must balance the often-competing priorities of their PE owners, employees, and internal strategic objectives. As decision-making structures evolve and companies scale, PE-owned firms require retirement solutions that not only provide consistency for employees but also retain the flexibility to adapt to shifting business goals and objectives.
In this multi-part series, we explore how Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs) can effectively address common challenges for employers with various 401(k) structures. In the first two parts, we discussed how PEPs can help employers through mergers and acquisitions, and how PEPs address the issues of non-integrated 401(k) plans. In this third part, we delve into how PEPs can be a game-changer for PE-owned firms.
A PEP is an innovative retirement savings solution that allows employers to outsource most of their plan management responsibilities, including fiduciary oversight. In a PEP, a third party Pooled Plan Provider (PPP) assumes responsibility for key plan management and administration duties. This reduces the burden on individual employers and creates economies of scale. A PEP provides both cost efficiencies and comprehensive fiduciary oversight by pooling assets and resources. This simplifies retirement plan management for businesses of all sizes.
01
Private equity firms are often driven by a keen focus on cost management, and this priority is passed down to their portfolio companies. To meet this demand, many PE-owned organizations face increasing pressure to consolidate services and achieve operational efficiencies. PEPs enable these companies to leverage economies of scale, significantly reducing vendor and investment fees. By consolidating plan services under a single, centralized solution, PE-owned businesses can lower administrative costs. This can reduce the financial burden for both plan sponsors and employees while still maintaining a competitive retirement offering.
02
PE-owned organizations often lack the internal resources necessary to manage the regulatory complexities and compliance risks associated with 401(k) plan management. Outsourcing fiduciary responsibilities through a PEP mitigates the risk of potential administrative or compliance issues. This could otherwise expose the organization to costly penalties or lawsuits. By entrusting these responsibilities to a specialized PEP provider, PE firms can ensure regulatory compliance while maintaining high-quality benefits offerings for employees. This approach helps safeguard both the firm and the participants from the ever-evolving landscape of retirement plan regulations.
03
As PE-owned businesses expand and restructure, the demand for scalable retirement plan solutions becomes more pressing. PEPs are uniquely positioned to support growth, providing a centralized plan management system that reduces administrative burden. By outsourcing plan administration and fiduciary duties, PE firms can focus on their broader strategic objectives, such as acquisitions, operational improvements, or other growth initiatives. With PEPs, PE firms gain the flexibility to scale their retirement offerings in line with evolving business needs, making the retirement plan adaptable and cost-effective.
04
Many PE firms aim to provide a consistent experience for employees across their portfolio companies. However, employees often encounter varying plan structures, investment options, vendors and resources depending on their employer. This inconsistency can create confusion among participants and hinder employee satisfaction. PEPs offer a standardized employee experience, with uniformity in investment offerings, plan design and support services across the entire portfolio. This consistency enhances employee engagement and satisfaction and promotes equity across the workforce. This is particularly important for attracting and retaining top talent across diverse portfolio companies.
05
PE-owned companies frequently undergo restructuring, resulting in shifts in decision-making processes and organizational priorities. These changes can challenge managing retirement plans, as decision-makers may have less time to dedicate to plan administration. PEPs provide the flexibility necessary to navigate these changes seamlessly. By outsourcing plan management, PE firms save time and resources. This allows leadership to focus on high-level strategic objectives without being bogged down by the complexities of retirement plan administration. PEPs are an attractive solution for PE firms experiencing shifting decision-making structures, allowing for smooth transitions and continued support for employees’ retirement needs.
PEPs present a streamlined, scalable solution for private equity-owned organizations seeking to optimize their retirement plan offerings. By outsourcing plan management and fiduciary duties, PE firms can reduce costs, mitigate regulatory and fiduciary risks and navigate changing decision-making structures. Simultaneously, PEPs provide a consistent and high-quality experience for plan participants, fostering greater equity across the workforce and supporting both the strategic goals of PE firms and the long term financial security of employees. With PEPs, PE firms can confidently manage their retirement plans while adapting to the evolving needs of their businesses and portfolios.
This document was prepared for general information purposes only and does not take into consideration individual circumstances. The information contained herein should not be considered a substitute for specific professional advice. In particular, its contents are not intended by Towers Watson Investment Services, Inc., and its parent, affiliates, and their respective directors, officers and employees (WTW) to be construed as the provision of investment, legal, accounting, tax or other professional advice or recommendations of any kind, or to form the basis of any decision to do or to refrain from doing anything. The information included in this presentation is not based on the particular investment situation or requirements of any specific trust, plan, fiduciary, plan participant or beneficiary, endowment, or any other fund; any examples or illustrations used in this presentation are hypothetical. As such, this document should not be relied upon for investment or other financial decisions and no such decisions should be taken on the basis of its contents without seeking specific advice. WTW does not intend for anything in this document to constitute “investment advice” within the meaning of 29 C.F.R.§ 2510.3-21 to any employee benefit plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and/or section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.
This document is based on information available to WTW at the date of issue and takes no account of subsequent developments. In addition, past performance is not indicative of future results. In producing this document WTW has relied upon the accuracy and completeness of certain data and information obtained from third parties. This document may not be reproduced or distributed to any other party, whether in whole or in part, without WTW’s prior written permission, except as may be required by law. Views expressed by other WTW consultants or affiliates may differ from the information presented herein. Actual recommendations, investments or investment decisions made by WTW, whether for its own account or on behalf of others, may differ from those expressed herein.
