Skip to main content
main content, press tab to continue
Article | Insider

DOL issues advisory opinion on investment management diversity program

By Gary Chase and Stephen Douglas | December 21, 2023

Plan sponsors interested in an investment management diversity program should discuss the advisory opinion and its implications with legal counsel.
Health and Benefits|Retirement
N/A

The Department of Labor (DOL) recently issued an advisory opinion that Citigroup Inc.’s program to increase the racial and gender diversity of the investment managers used by the benefit plans of Citigroup and its affiliates (Citi) would not violate ERISA’s fiduciary responsibility rules. An advisory opinion is a written response from the DOL that applies well-established legal principles or interpretations to a specific set of facts submitted by an individual or organization.

Diversity program

Under Citi’s diversity program, corporate assets are used to pay some or all of the investment management fees for qualified managers that:

  • Satisfy certain diversity requirements
  • Are selected by the investment committee to manage some of the assets held by Citi’s plans (which may include defined benefit, defined contribution and welfare benefit plans that hold investment assets)

Citi intends to publicize the diversity program to the general public as well as plan participants and beneficiaries; however, individual decisions regarding investment managers will not be publicized. Investment managers who are party in interests (as defined in ERISA) will not be eligible to participate in the program.

The investment committee will select the investment managers for the plans based on appropriate selection factors (e.g., fees, credentials, assets under management, experience). The diversity program will not require the investment committee to use any particular search or selection process or to explain any decisions related to the diversity program. Further, Citi will not require any goals or quotas to be met in order for the investment management fees to be reimbursed. However, the investment managers covered by the diversity program will have an advantage in the selection process based on fees, since at least a portion of their investment management fees will be paid by Citi instead of the plans.

Advisory opinion findings

The DOL reached the following conclusions regarding Citi’s request for an advisory opinion to address fiduciary questions related to its diversity program:

  • The decision to pay the reasonable fees of an investment manager is a settlor activity; therefore, Citi is not acting as a fiduciary in connection with the selection of an investment manager due to the payment of the manager’s fees from corporate assets. The DOL would consider the payment of the investment management fee by Citi as a settlor activity, similar to any other decision by a sponsor to pay the plan’s reasonable expenses.
  • The investment committee will not violate its fiduciary obligations under ERISA sections 403 (exclusive benefit rule), 404 (reasonable care and prudence rule) and 406 (prohibited transaction rule) solely due to considering Citi’s payment of certain investment management fees that would otherwise be paid by the plan. In addition, the DOL will not consider the investment committee’s fiduciary best judgment to be influenced based on an awareness that the diversity program would benefit Citi’s reputation; however, the investment committee cannot exercise its fiduciary authority for the purpose of benefitting Citi’s public policy goals. Whether the investment committee ultimately satisfies its fiduciary duties will be based on specific facts and circumstances.
  • With regard to a private label fund for which the investment manager is selected by the investment committee, the ERISA section 404(c) disclosure (fiduciary safe harbor for self-directed investments) would be satisfied by disclosing the expense ratio without regard to the portion paid by Citi, the expense ratio after Citi’s payment of a portion of the investment manager fees and an explanation of Citi’s commitment to reimburse those fees.

Going forward

The advisory opinion is an interpretation of established law, so it appears that the DOL’s findings in this case may be applied to similar approaches. It is important to note, however, that the advisory opinion does not create a binding precedent. The DOL could reach different conclusions for future cases.

Plan sponsors interested in implementing an approach similar to Citi’s program to support diversity or other environmental, social or governance factors should discuss the advisory opinion and its implications with legal counsel.

Authors

Director, Retirement and Executive Compensation

Senior Director, Retirement and Executive Compensation

Related content tags, list of links Article Insider Health and Benefits Retirement
Contact us