The COVID-19 pandemic shone the spotlight on health and social care providers’ use of do not resuscitate (DNR) or do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACR) orders. Critics of DNR orders say they are open to misuse. It’s argued DNR orders are not always understood or applied as originally intended, therefore putting people’s lives at risk. Those defending DNR orders suggest they are an important element of compassionate care.
In this insight, we examine the legal, insurance and risk management landscape surrounding DNR orders, offering practical insight to help your health and social care organisation by reducing potential harms to patients and your organisation’s risk exposures.
Why are there concerns over DNR orders?
A 2021 investigation by care watchdog the Care Quality Commission (CQC) highlighted more than 500 potential breaches of individuals’ human rights due to inappropriate use of DNR orders. Recent media coverage of an incident involving a Mr Robert Murray, further brings some of the issues into focus.
Mr Murray, an 80-year-old resident of a care home in Eastbourne, sadly died from choking on a piece of fruit after paramedics were stood down due to the presence of a DNR order in his medical records. His family argued Mr Murray would have survived if the care home had checked and understood what the DNR meant, rather than assuming the DNR represented a blanket de facto reason to deny all treatment.
What does a DNR cover and when are they appropriate?
A DNR order does not mean ‘do not treat.’ Rather, it means you should not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) – an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the patient’s heart stops beating. You can, and should, in appropriate circumstances, provide other treatment that may prolong life, such as other emergency treatments, transfusions or using a ventilator.
What does the law say about DNR orders?
The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 are U.K. laws recognising three primary situations that permit the making of DNR decisions:
- When a person with full capacity to make such a decision explicitly requests a DNR order. This will need to be communicated to all medical staff. Such a request can be made at any point.
- Where a doctor, based on their professional medical judgment, deems a resuscitation attempt would probably not succeed.
- In situation where a doctor has thoroughly discussed with the person and believes the potential negatives of CPR outweigh its benefits – for example, if CPR were to restore the person’s heartbeat/breathing at the cost of significantly diminished quality of life.
However, it’s important to remember, under the law, neither service user nor their family members must give approval for a DNR. In other words, a doctor has the authority to implement a DNR order even if the patient or their family does not desire one. It is also important to note service users cannot insist on receiving CPR if the medical professional deems it would be detrimental to them.
The role of medical malpractice cover in managing DNR order risks
We are often asked by health and social care providers about whether they may need medical malpractice cover and this question applies in the context of DNR orders understanding the differences between medical malpractice and the cover your organisation might consider through a treatment risk extension to your public liability insurance.



