Skip to main content
main content, press tab to continue
Article

Professional indemnity (PI) and regulatory investigations: What law firms need to know in 2025

By Jack Lowndes | July 14, 2025

The market is evolving, and your policy needs to keep up.
Financial, Executive and Professional Risks (FINEX)
N/A

The regulatory burden on English and Welsh law firms continues to intensify. Notwithstanding the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Minimum Terms and Conditions, for firms purchasing PI insurance, this regulatory focus has direct implications—not just on premium levels, but on how well policies respond when regulatory scrutiny hits.

From client money audits to SRA behavioural probes, firms are under increased scrutiny and asking: “Will our policy respond, and if so, how?”

  1. 01

    Rising Tide: Regulatory Investigations Are More Common and Complex

    The SRA’s remit has expanded. Investigations are now frequently triggered by:

    • Client money handling breaches
    • Anti money laundering (AML) and compliance deficiencies
    • Procedural conduct breaches and complaints
    • Technology and data failures

    And it’s not just investigations—the early-stage legal costs, internal reviews and reputational fallout can be just as disruptive.

  2. 02

    Do PI Policies Respond to Regulatory Investigations? Sometimes, But Not Always

    Notwithstanding the SRA Minimum Terms and Conditions, Professional Indemnity policies are not identical. Here’s where firms often trip up:

    PI risk areas and coverage

    Does your current PI policy correctly cover risk areas affecting your organisation?
    Risk Area Are You Covered?
    Early legal fees advising on an investigation Subject to wording. May be treated as part of wider defence costs
    Internal investigative costs Often not covered
    SRA or FCA inquiries May only be covered once formal investigation or notice received
    Reputation management expenditure Rarely included in a PI policy

    It’s critical to carefully review the policy wording—not just rely on assumptions. That’s where a broker like Willis plays a key role.

  3. 03

    What Should Law Firms Be Doing Now?

    At Willis, we’re helping firms proactively respond to this shift in three ways:

    • Gap analysis: Reviewing policy wording against likely regulatory scenarios
    • Strategic placement: Ensuring policies are tailored to respond when needed
    • Claims preparedness: Helping firms document and manage investigations in ways that maximise cover.
  4. 04

    Hot Topics Insurers Are Flagging in 2025

    Client Money Breaches: this remains one of the top causes of SRA intervention.

    Cyber Events: PI underwriters are tightening scrutiny on data breach response—even if not a standalone cyber claim.

    Professional Misconduct: as a focus of the SRA, underwriters are increasingly focused on the internal measures within firms that are in place to deter dishonest and unethical behaviour, along with those to ensure client protection.

  5. 05

    Our Take: A Policy That Doesn’t Respond When You Need It Most Isn’t Worth the Saving

    Firms must see PI not just as a regulatory tick-box, but a strategic shield. You want confidence that when regulators call, your policy is built to help—not hold you back.

Each investigation has its nuances—but most PI wordings aren’t written with this in mind. That’s why we work with clients to provide a tailored solution and build clarity.”

Jack Lowndes | Associate Director, PI Legal Services

Next Steps

If you haven’t reviewed your PI policy wording this year—especially the regulatory provisions—now’s the time.

Reach out to us today to request a wording review

Author


Associate Director - PI FINEX Legal Services

Professional indemnity insurance contact


Jade Scorer
Director FINEX PI

Contact us