Skip to main content
main content, press tab to continue
Article

Data centres: Some professional indemnity considerations

By Peter London | February 26, 2026

As demand for Data Centres accelerates, firms involved in their design and construction should consider the exposures resulting from their services
Financial, Executive and Professional Risks (FINEX)
N/A

The persistent growth in demand for digital services and cloud computing, and the relentless advance of AI continues to drive huge demand for data centres, domestically and internationally. An increasingly urgent demand for further capacity is providing a huge opportunity for businesses with expertise in the design, build and operation of data centres and associated digital infrastructure.

There are all manner of insurance considerations in relation to data centres, potentially impacting owners, developers, tenants, as well as those firms engaged to design, build, operate and maintain them. This article focusses solely on professional indemnity insurance (PI).

Digital infrastructure and data centers: Connections beyond insurance

Potential PI considerations

Data centres are sophisticated assets, incorporating advanced technologies and elaborate, sensitive systems requiring precise temperatures, atmospheric conditions and vast amounts of power. Such complex, controlled environments necessitate precise and intricate designs, demanding high-performance standards. CAPEX requirements are high, and procurement of key components is likely to become increasingly challenging in the rush for capacity. Firms must also navigate evolving regulatory climates, environmental concerns and security risks.

Even small errors in the design, construction and operations / maintenance could have significant financial and operational ramifications, and the potential costs of mitigating and rectifying problems could be huge. Consequential losses can and frequently do dwarf the costs of rectification, and such exposure will represent a primary concern for PI underwriters.

Data Centres underpin nearly all digital services and economic activity. With so much reliance upon them and the critical data they process, Insurers will be fixated on potential exposure to consequential / indirect losses stemming from data centre outages, even for very short periods.

As with any new growth area, but exacerbated by the complexity of data centres and heightened demands in relation to AI, Insurers will be wary of insureds rushing into opportunities without appropriate expertise and experience. They will also have concerns stemming from the urgency to build new data centres (and potentially aggressive timelines as a result), and the potential for corner-cutting and rushed project timelines as a result. In the rush for capacity, the procurement of key items will be increasingly challenging and costly, and procurement issues could have problematic ramifications on projects.

Insurers will recognise the power and leverage of some of the biggest companies commissioning data centres, and their ability to impose punitive contractual terms on design teams who may accept them because of a lack of bargaining power and their desire to win work.

PI risk management: What firms should demonstrate

There have already been many PI claims in relation to data centres, and there will no doubt be more. Businesses must protect themselves as best possible, both operationally and contractually. They would also be well-advised to provide appropriate comfort to their PI Insurers, to ensure their involvement in this sector doesn’t detract from their attractiveness to insurers. For example:

  • Highlighting expertise and experience, risk management processes and contractual protections will be hugely valuable.
  • PI Insurers will evidently favour specialist businesses, sufficiently resourced and with appropriate experience.
  • The nature of the services to be provided will be central to perceived risk. Highlighting a tight focus on scope and a clear understanding of responsibilities and expectations between themselves and the client will be important.
  • Due diligence on the prospective client is important. Working with knowledgeable clients who have reasonable expectations is important, as is ensuring that their expectations in terms of timings, requirements, and budgets are realistic.
  • Due diligence on supply chains (in terms of their financial position and the PI that they maintain) is also critically important, as firms will be liable for their actions in the first instance.
  • Whether or not a data centre is being designed / built for a specific client or speculatively will be significant and could have ramifications in terms of performance requirements and evolving needs, for example.

Contractual Liability protections

Clearly, the extent of contractual liabilities assumed is critical, and firms should negotiate as much protection within their appointments as possible. Some examples of the sort of protections that firms should seek are as follows:

  • Liability caps are vital given potential exposures. Firms should limit their total liability to an appropriate financial amount commensurate with risk (for an aggregate amount only).
  • Effective exclusions of liability for consequential / indirect losses (with limited ‘carve-outs’) are also critical. These will be hugely significant in the eyes of Insurers and will offer vital protection to the parties relying on them.
  • Net Contribution Clauses, which aim to restrict liability to the proportion of loss for which a firm is responsible.
  • Reasonable performance requirements, avoiding performance warranties or guarantees, and ensuring that the ‘duty of care’ in respect of the provision of their professional services is not elevated beyond the requirement to use reasonable skill and care.
  • Clauses protecting against inflation and procurement issues and requiring reasonable and realistic timelines.
  • Scope of Services: an appropriately tight definition of scope and client requirements could prove critical in the defence of a claim. Terms of engagement should set out exactly what services will and will not be provided - this is an area which is often the source of disputes.

These suggestions are by no means an exhaustive list of options, and legal opinion should be sought when considering the inclusion and likely efficacy of contractual clauses. PI Insurers are aware that successfully negotiating such contractual terms is far from easy. But they will still be keen to see that the firms they insure are thinking in this way, particularly in a sector exposed to this degree of risk.

Author


Associate Director – PI Construction FINEX GB

Contacts


Director of FINEX Construction PI

Jade Scorer
Director FINEX PI

Contact us