Insurance underwriting of company acquisitions: identifying transaction risks
By virtue of its sector, jurisdictional exposure, financial history, asset base and other considerations, each company is unique and therefore when seeking to acquire a target company, a purchaser will undertake due diligence to better understand the intricacies and the condition of the assets that it will inherit. Similarly, when warranty and indemnity (W&I) insurance is built into the scope of a transaction, the insurer will conduct its own analysis on the target and its assets before a policy is incepted to better understand the extent of its financial exposure in the event that a warranty is incorrect; this process of insurer analysis is what constitutes “underwriting”.
Due diligence reports
W&I insurance provides cover in respect of unknown and undisclosed matters that give rise to a breach of warranty or indemnity; it is not intended to provide cover for undiligenced matter. Considered due diligence therefore remains paramount as a suitably scoped due diligence exercise will tend to bring a transaction within insurer appetite. During the underwriting process, an insurer will not commission its own due diligence on the target but will instead review the findings of the due diligence reports prepared by or on behalf of the buyer. As such, the more thorough the diligence exercise, the broader the insurance cover that might be afforded. At a minimum, an insurer will require sight of legal, tax and financial due diligence reports and over the past year we have seen a trend emerge amongst buyers whereby technical, commercial, environmental and insurance diligence reports are also prepared (see our previous article on Transactional risk mitigation tools: Warranty and Indemnity and Due Diligence for further discussion on this topic).
Underwriting questions
Following the review of the diligence reports, the insurer will ask a series of questions which seek (i) to better understand the transaction and the scope and adequacy of the diligence, (ii) to clarify any areas of misunderstanding and fill in gaps in the insurer’s knowledge, and (iii) to assist the insurer in gaining comfort with the accuracy of the warranties on the basis of the diligence carried out. These questions are commonly known as “Tranche 1” and “Tranche 2” underwriting questions; with the former being more general in nature and the latter being tailored to the specific details of the transaction and due diligence findings.
Underwriting call
The underwriting call is an exploratory conversation which gives the insurer the opportunity to speak directly to deal team members and diligence advisers and enables any outstanding concerns to be discussed and addressed such that the insurer can provide as fulsome cover as possible. The insurer will use the written responses to the underwriting questions as the agenda for the call, focusing only on areas where it requires further detail. For this reason, not every deal requires an underwriting call and in recent years, there has been a trend towards insurers requiring underwriting calls on only larger or more complex transactions.
