With media proliferating and attention spans shortening, it’s harder to get consumers’ attention. Brands have to come up with cleverer ways to make their products and services stand out from the pack.
But in trying to push the boundaries and get their advertising noticed, they may wander into a controversy that undermines the purpose of the campaign and backfires on their reputation.
At a time when social issues are more contested, ads designed to appeal to one demographic may alienate another. In a polarized world, this can lead to boycotts and counter campaigns. For example, a major drinks brand provoked a social media storm among its conservative customer base when it launched a campaign based around a transgender personality. The fallout seriously impacted the company’s revenue and share price.
Inauthentic ads erode consumer trust
Conversely, ads that are seen as inauthentic or misleading can offend the audience a brand is trying to attract. Many campaigns have been accused of greenwashing or pinkwashing for their efforts to link with environmental and social causes. This can lead to an erosion of public trust – in a UK survey, just one-fifth of consumers said they trust the sustainability claims made by clothing brands.[1]
Despite internal sign off processes, brands can fail to anticipate a negative reaction – even when it seems obvious in retrospect, as when a major fashion brand ran an ad that showed children posing with bondage clothing.
Brands need to think more critically
There’s a risk that marketing teams and agencies can become so wedded to a creative approach, no one is listening to voices of caution. An ad can be sent on its way, only to rebound on the company’s image – when this could have been prevented with a bit more critical thinking.
The proliferation of social media means a lot more people are listening to signals of negative sentiment – and can amplify it, multiplying its impact in minutes on social media. In the worst cases, this can lead to losses of trust, revenue and ultimately value in the brand.
False advertising risks are growing
Ads that make false claims about a product, whether it’s misdescribing functions or ingredients, or promising unrealistic health or performance benefits, can also be reputationally damaging. This area is a source of increasing regulation and litigation in countries such as the U.S., where a new regulation on deceptive advertising practices has come into force with enhanced fines.[2] Companies penalised for false advertising may also be required to run corrective advertising, reimburse customers, or face class-action lawsuits, with significant reputational blowback.
Concerns such as these around legal actions and settlements accounted for more than a third (34%) of reputation risk-related discussion about advertising among stakeholders over the year to March 2025, as shown in this chart from real-time intelligence provider Polecat.

