Insurance companies manage some of the most complex and varied sales incentive programs. This sector is known for intricate, entrenched sales incentive practices, and diverse sales models.
In fact, when we ask people to provide an example of a sales role with a heavy emphasis on incentive compensation, the first thing they typically say is “insurance agent,” highlighting the industry's reputation for highly variable compensation. Traditionally, insurers adopted a "what can we afford to share" strategy for agent incentives—offering no base salary and fully commissioned programs.
Actuaries seemingly effortlessly created elaborate programs for structuring and delivering incentives, which often included customizing commission rates by product and policy year. It didn’t seem to matter that the resulting programs were communicated through 100-page commission binders.
It is unsurprising that many insurers use this variable, product-driven model to anchor compensation for other sales roles. This approach was the basis for wholesaler compensation plans, although the wholesaler's role significantly differs from an insurance agent. But insurance industry sales extend well beyond familiar roles like agents and wholesalers.
The field becomes complex when considering diverse lines of business, often existing within the same company (such as Individual Insurance, Group Insurance, Individual Retirement, Group Retirement, Property and Casualty, Wealth Management, etc.).
Additionally, there are various distribution models, including Direct to Consumer, Proprietary Agents, Independent Agents, Third-Party Distribution, and Affiliate Marketing. Given this business context, it is not surprising that the typical insurance company sales incentive framework is complicated.
Key trends and insights
To supplement anecdotal experience, WTW conducted an insurance industry sales compensation survey to understand the current state, providing insight into trends and challenges for improving compensation effectiveness.
Call to Action for HR
Beyond highlighting challenges such as simplicity, strategic alignment, and governance, other challenges were also cited, including pay transparency. The opportunity to improve is clear. Addressing these opportunities can boost motivation, align compensation with corporate goals, and enhance clarity.
This gives HR a chance to enhance strategic influence on sales incentives. Moving from reactive to proactive strategies could empower HR to improve compensation practices and organizational success and add value to the commercial organization. How can HR participate in sales compensation?
Rewards: Set up and oversee a governance process; Advise on integrating sales incentives (and sales incentive changes) into the total rewards framework
HR Generalists: Assist in the review/redesign process, especially in companies without dedicated rewards professionals; In companies with rewards professionals, serve as a bridge between the commercial organization and the rest of HR and rewards
Sales Compensation Communications: Aid in the development of content and tools to successfully implement and manage sales incentive plans (e.g., ensure communication consists of more than just an Excel table with numbers); Collaborate with sales to effectively promote new plans, fostering enthusiasm and motivation
Learning and Development: Create manager training programs and materials; Work with internal communications to design an implementation strategy anticipating field learning needs for effective plan use
Plan Participant Research: Monitor the effects of incentive plan changes and sales team reactions and understanding; Develop pre- and post-measurement benchmarks to assess plan impact and offer insights for potential adjustments
Each journey starts with the first step. One way to start the journey is to simply ask: "How effective is the sales compensation program?"
Authors
Sales effectiveness and rewards
Develop talent management and rewards strategies designs for your sales teams.