Skip to main content
main content, press tab to continue
Article

Unable to plan in 2025? ‘Leave no scenario behind’ with AI

By John M. Bremen | August 28, 2025

Effective leaders use scenario planning to avoid stagnation or delayed decision making as recent advances in generative AI change how they approach scenario development.
Employee Experience|Risk and Analytics|Thinking Ahead Institute|Work Transformation
Artificial Intelligence

During recent in-person discussions with boards and senior leaders in Asia, the Americas and Europe, the directors and executives cited the inability to plan as their single greatest business challenge in 2025. Consequently, effective leaders are conducting robust scenario planning to avoid stagnation or delayed decision making as recent advances in generative AI change how they approach scenario development.

Why are businesses unable to plan?

The global leaders provided several concurrent challenges that make planning difficult:

  • No “new normal”: The unprecedented disruption of the pandemic and various global conflicts in recent years have created societal and political volatility that has made establishing the “new normal,” expected in the wake of the pandemic, elusive. Consumer markets, labor markets, work arrangements, supply chains and other factors remain in flux
  • Interconnected and more frequent risks: Events once thought rare occur more often, at scales previously unseen, impacting business strategy and operations in complex and nonlinear ways that vary by country and sector. Business risks in the first half of 2025 included ongoing climate events (devastating fires, floods and severe weather), property peril, financial investment flows, gray-zone attacks, wars, shipping infrastructure, cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, commodity prices, and employee and executive security
  • AI and new tech: Generative AI, agentic AI, spatial and quantum computing, and other new technologies continue to surprise users and leaders in what they can and cannot do. AI development, for example, has experienced both advances and setbacks. Setbacks include:
    • An increasing number of AI applications performing below expectations
    • The ability to use technology that isn't keeping up with developments
    • Data, skills and deployment abilities not keeping up with the technology
    • New forms of regulation and lawsuits make governance difficult
  • Policy changes: Country-specific policy shifts from the 2024 biggest election year in history are making mid- and long-term planning difficult. Pivots in rules and regulations, trade conditions and tariffs from new regimes worldwide have become the norm

Said one senior executive recently, “We used to have a core scenario in place with a handful of backups, but now we need to have literally hundreds of options on the table and know which one to follow at any given time. And the answer can change daily or weekly and vary by product line or country.”

The role of scenario analysis: Rehearsing the future

Peter Schwartz, a pioneer of scenario planning and author of The Art of the Long View, likened the use of scenarios to “rehearsing the future.” Similar to rehearsing a theater production, the process of scenario development historically required a collaborative effort of numerous individuals and several days, weeks or months of refinement before the scenarios were ready for their intended audience. This traditional approach to scenario development generally was time-consuming and resource intensive.

The role of AI in scenario planning: ‘No scenario left behind’

Recently in Silicon Valley, PruVen Capital Managing Partner Ramneek Gupta shared the concept of “no scenario left behind.” He and his colleagues have been studying advances in scenario planning and funding solutions that could enable business leaders to leverage advanced AI such as large language models (LLMs) and large geotemporal models (LGMs). LGMs use frameworks that analyze and reason across both time and space to exhaustively simulate virtually any and every event and scenario. These AI models provide dynamic risk modeling and real-time simulations for a vast array of business scenarios, allowing business leaders to address the inability to plan.

WTW’s Jessica Boyd and Cameron Rye explain that advances in generative AI tools have enabled the rapid generation of numerous scenario narratives across a wide range of disciplines. These models accelerate the traditional, resource-heavy process of scenario development, streamlining the steps while introducing novel perspectives that human analysts might overlook. They help overcome the limitations of human imagination that occur when people overlook or underestimate potential risks that have not yet happened in historical data. This can reduce potential blind spots that otherwise leave organizations vulnerable to highly disruptive events.

Already, AI breakthroughs have enabled the next stage of scenario planning using advanced language models in areas such as weather forecasting, including hurricane landfall predictions, as well as political and economic modeling. These models provide the opportunity to expand beyond the traditional exploratory scenarios that most businesses currently use. For example, normative scenarios (similar to a reverse stress test) can add significant value when they are built around specific business objectives.

Further, within the U.K. and Europe, new regulations focused on financial institutions have sparked considerable attention on scenario testing (Operational Resilience 2025 in the U.K. and Digital Operational Resilience Act [DORA] in the EU). These rules have further increased the importance of well-developed and defined scenarios, including scenario testing with third parties.

How to start scenario planning and conducting an impact analysis

Recently, WTW’s Laura Kelly explained how scenario building and impact analysis have become crucial parts of business planning and risk management. She suggests three key steps in scenario planning and impact analysis:

  1. Prioritize key risk scenarios: Identify operational risks using robust internal and external data. Common risks include:
    • Priority risks for the business (typically high-severity, low frequency)
    • Emerging risks
    • Internal and external events
    • Regulatory risks
  1. Facilitate workshops: Once key risk scenarios are identified, conduct workshops with potentially impacted teams from across the business, for example, risk, legal, HR, regulatory, technical and IT. Topics could include:
    • Scenario review
    • Potential impacts to each line of service
    • Potential control failures and control owners
    • Key drivers and relevant internal event information
    • Rationale for response assumptions
    • Frequency and severity impact of events
    • Challenge of assumptions
  1. Analyze and document: Create outputs that typically include:
    • Potential control failures/causation
    • Consequences/Impacts
    • Insurability with commentary
    • Financial impacts (e.g., 1:5 years, 1:25 years, 1:100 years)
    • Insurable financial impact (worst-case severity)
    • Percentage of insurance coverage for the scenario

Effective leaders are not halted by uncertainty but rather mobilize around it. They identify the broad range of scenarios that might occur in a given set of circumstances, prioritize the greatest risks as well as the solutions that can mitigate these risks and enable the company to thrive.

A version of this article originally appeared on Forbes on August 15, 2025.

Author


Managing Director and Chief Innovation and Acceleration Officer
email Email

Contact us