The WTW Pension Index has slightly increased in the first quarter due to positive asset returns, partially offset by a small increase in accounting liability measures. The net effect on our benchmark plan was an increase of 0.8% in the WTW Pension Index (from 103.0 to 103.8) for the quarter.
The Bank of Canada lowered its overnight lending rate by 25 bps in January and by a further 25 bps in March, bringing the policy rate down to 2.75% at the end of the quarter. The Bank of Canada has normalized its balance sheet, ending quantitative tightening and restarted asset purchases, as part of normal balance sheet management, in early March in line with growth in the economy. Core inflation, the Bank’s preferred measure of inflation trends, remained within target. As of March, CPI increased 2.3% year-over-year, which was higher than January, but a decrease from the 2.6% of February, reflecting some rebound in goods price inflation and the end of the temporary suspension of the GST/HST. However, the unpredictable economic trade policy shifts between the U.S. and Canada makes it challenging to project GDP growth and presents an unusual level of uncertainty about the economy and what policy direction the Bank of Canada may take in the future.
The yield on 30-year Canada treasuries finished the quarter 10 bps lower than it started. Credit spreads increased during the quarter by 15 bps. The benchmark discount rate determined under the RATE:Link methodology used to determine defined benefit obligations increased by 2 bps, which combined with the effect of interest accumulation led to an increase in accounting liability measures over the quarter.
Mar. 2025 | Dec. 2024 | Mar. 2024 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Canada Treasuries[1] | ||||
30-year | 3.23 | 3.33 | 3.34 | |
10-year | 2.97 | 3.23 | 3.45 | |
91-day T-bill | 2.63 | 3.15 | 5.01 | |
Corporate Bonds[1] | ||||
FTSE | 3.91 | 4.09 | 4.92 | |
Benchmark Discount Rate | 4.70 | 4.68 | 4.86 |
The first quarter of 2025 saw mixed returns in global equity markets in local currency terms, with most markets starting the year off strong but receding in February and March, driven largely by heightened policy uncertainty amidst persistent trade tension. The US equities market posted negative returns over the quarter due to tariff concerns and noticeable impacts on the "Magnificent 7" valuations with the arrival of DeepSeek’s low-cost AI. Several central banks, including the Bank of Canada, cut interest rates while others, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, paused their rate-cutting cycles.
Canadian equities posted a modest gain of 1.5% for the first quarter, with most of the positive performance driven by the Materials sector, which surged 20.3%. This sharp rise was likely fueled by investors seeking safer assets amid a backdrop of political uncertainty. The Utilities sector came in a distant second with a return of 4.9%, while most other sectors recorded negative returns. On the economic front, employment figures strengthened in January but stalled in February. While interest rate cuts provided some support to labour demand, ongoing trade tensions posed a threat to the broader recovery in the job market. The announcement of unprecedented tariffs by the United States, and the pause of most of those measures at the beginning of Q2, has added another layer of complexity. For investors, the policy whiplash has made navigating already volatile markets even more challenging.
Currency movements were notable in Q1, with the Canadian dollar holding steady against the U.S. dollar, declining by only 0.07%, but noticeably weakening against most major currencies, which impacted unhedged Canadian investors differently across their foreign equity investments. CAD returns were improved on investments in foreign equities during the quarter.
In Q1, the Canadian bond market saw yields decline across the curve, with the most pronounced drop occurring at the short end, which fell by 52 bps. This shift followed the Bank of Canada's expansionary monetary policy, including additional rate cuts and a pivot back toward asset purchases and concern about possible stagflation. The broad decline in yields resulted in positive returns across all bond segments. Corporate bonds underperformed government bonds, despite their higher yields, undermined by shorter duration in a decreasing yield and modest widening credit spreads environment.
Q1 2025 | YTD | Last 12 months | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Stock Returns | ||||
Canadian Equities – S&P/TSX Composite[2] | 1.5% | 1.5% | 15.8% | |
U.S. Equities – S&P 500 (Canadian dollars)[3] | -4.4% | -4.4% | 15.0% | |
Non-North American Equities – MSCI EAFE (Canadian dollars) [4] | 6.8% | 6.8% | 11.3% | |
Canadian Fixed Income Returns | ||||
91-day T-Bills | 0.8% | 0.8% | 4.5% | |
FTSE Universe Bonds | 2.0% | 2.0% | 7.7% | |
FTSE Long Bonds | 1.8% | 1.8% | 7.0% |
The benchmark plan’s 50% equity / 50% fixed income portfolio increased 1.6% for the quarter. The more conservative 30% equity portfolio increased 1.7% for the quarter, and the more aggressive 70% equity portfolio increased 1.4% for the quarter.
Pension plan liabilities under Canadian, International and U.S. accounting standards are measured using a discount rate based on yields available on high-quality corporate bonds as of the measurement date. Using the same RATE:Link methodology as we use for the WTW Pension Index in other countries, the discount rate for our Canadian benchmark plan increased over the quarter by 2 bps to 4.70% as of March 31, 2025. Among other factors, the selected discount rate depends on projected plan cash flows, the bond data and the methodology utilized for constructing the yield curve. The RATE:Link approach represents one possible methodology; other acceptable methodologies may result in higher or lower discount rates, and consequently lower or higher plan liabilities.
WTW tracks the monthly change in its Pension Index in a series that dates to December 31, 2000. Like bond prices, pension liability values move in the opposite direction to interest rates. The WTW Pension Liability Index increased by 0.8% for the quarter, reflecting the combined effect of interest accumulation and the benchmark discount rate change.
The net impact of the increase in accounting liability measures and positive investment returns resulted in a net increase in the WTW Pension Index over the quarter, from 103.0 to 103.8 as of March 31, 2025. The change in the WTW Pension Index does not reflect any contributions made to reduce the size of any deficit or any contribution holiday taken on account of any surplus.
Q1 2025 | YTD | Last 12 Months | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Portfolio Returns | ||||
30% Stocks/70% Fixed Income | 1.7% | 1.7% | 9.1% | |
50% Stocks/50% Fixed Income | 1.6% | 1.6% | 10.5% | |
70% Stocks/30% Fixed Income | 1.4% | 1.4% | 11.9% | |
Benchmark Plan Liability Results | ||||
Change in Pension Liability Index | 0.8% | 0.8% | 7.1% | |
Percentage Change in Pension Index | 0.8% | 0.8% | 3.1% |
Those organizations that monitor their global pension plans are prepared to act quickly when market conditions evolve and have been most successful in achieving their cost and risk management objectives. Monitoring for such conditions is most effective when done in real-time, tailored to the specific characteristics of each retirement plan and supporting assets.
The Pension Finance Watch captures results for benchmark plans at the end of each quarter and can be a useful guide. For those organizations wishing to inform key business decisions for their own plans, WTW supports the daily monitoring of funded status and other key pension financial metrics via the Cost and Risk Management Channel, contact your consultant for more information.
Beyond financial monitoring, we observe multinationals with the greatest success in managing their defined benefit pension risks exhibit a number of consistent characteristics. They:
For more insights on the common techniques multinational organizations have deployed to manage pension risk, we encourage you to read our article on Mastering DB Risks Globally.
This publication tracks the asset/liability performance of a hypothetical Canadian benchmark pension plan, based on a 50/50 asset mix and a typical liability profile. The index is not intended to represent an average funded ratio. Rather, the intent is to provide plan sponsors with a consistent and relevant measure to serve as a general indicator of the effects of capital market events on pension plan financing.
This report reviews how capital market performance affected Canadian defined benefit pension plans, with a focus on linked asset/liability results. Specific plan results depend on liability characteristics, portfolio composition and actual investment results, among other factors.
Title | File Type | File Size |
---|---|---|
Pension Finance Watch – First Quarter 2025 | .3 MB |