Corporate boards, faced with increasing global unpredictability and volatility, recognise that the call for a stronger philosophical model for stewardship is growing louder than ever. No longer will the traditional governance frameworks that they relied on, which were focussed primarily on compliance and risk mitigation, be expected to successfully manage the complex and multifaceted challenges and opportunities of the day. Instead, there is a need for stewardship – one that emphasises long-term value creation, ethical leadership, and sustainable impact.
As effective corporate stewards, board members are expected to preserve, protect, and increase value over time. They need a model that would enable them to make decisions that best balance the diverse interests of multiple stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, customers, and society at large. One such model is WTW’s global stewardship model, which incorporates the following five Ps: Purpose, People, Planet, Protection, Performance. The principles underpinning each of these elements can serve as foundational pillars, guiding organisations towards responsible decision-making and long-term value creation.
As corporate stewards, board members are constantly sailing on the seas against a background where societal assumptions and environmental directives are in flux. They must therefore take on extensive commitments in the face of the intertwined character of financial, social, and environmental dictates. This will entail not only reconceptualised performance measurement standards to encompass sustainability, but also making sure governance habits from human capital to climate change deliberations are in agreement.
Boards need to also be aware that ethical governance should be a moral duty to a planet that requires oversight, not just a crucial directive. To conclude, boards ought to foster an attitude concentrating on the future, thus they should expect problems and grab chances to pioneer new ideas. And when organisations decide on aggressive multiyear objectives, they can make their activities successful even when the situation changes. This would enable their duties to be in line with stewardship requirements, thereby arriving at a balanced mix of profit and purpose.
This article was first published in the July 2025 issue of Asian Management Insights magazine by the Centre for Management Practice, Singapore Management University (SMU). It is reproduced here with written permission from SMU. No part of this article, whether in whole or in part, may be reproduced without prior permission from SMU and WTW.