Skip to main content
main content, press tab to continue
Article

How energy companies can supercharge their electrification strategy with subsea cables

Energy Market Review 2025

By Thomas Mallindine and Chris Ling | May 22, 2025

In this 2025 Energy Market Review article, we outline why subsea cables are essential for transitioning offshore oil and gas platforms towards cleaner energy sources.
N/A
N/A

Business models are reshaping as oil and gas producers are increasingly looking at the integration of renewables to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the extraction and production of oil and gas. Subsea cables are key enablers as existing offshore platforms are retrofitted with electrified equipment, new electrified platforms are switched on, and energy is transferred across an increasingly connected network.

Subsea cables are essential for transitioning offshore oil and gas platforms towards cleaner energy sources, enhancing operational efficiency and reducing environmental impacts.

Subsea cables can jumpstart new opportunities for the energy sector

Subsea cables enable four key opportunities for energy companies:

  1. 01

    Power transmission

    Subsea cables connect offshore platforms to onshore power grids, providing a reliable and continuous supply of electricity. This reduces the need for onboard generators, decreasing fuel consumption and emissions.

  2. 02

    Data communication

    High-speed communication through subsea fiber-optic cables allows for real-time monitoring and remote control of offshore operations, enhancing safety and efficiency.

  3. 03

    Interconnection

    Subsea cables serve as interconnectors between offshore facilities, enabling the transfer of power and data between platforms, production sites and support vessels.

  4. 04

    Renewable energy integration

    Subsea power cables are used to transfer remote, renewable energy to platforms, removing the reliance on fossil fuels.


While many of the technicalities of a dynamic subsea cable will be different to existing offshore risers or umbilicals, parallels can be drawn in the installation methodology and connection point technologies. Risk-resilient energy companies will have existing contingency plans in place for traditional fossil fuel operations, and in many cases, the concepts can be extended to electrified processes:

  • Considering inventory, including spare parts
  • Ensuring backup generators and other equipment are on standby to power operations in the event of failure or disruption
  • Creating repair pools as mutuals in partnership with other companies that are connected in their subsea networks to ensure a repair vessel is on standby to avoid delays and downtime

Contingency plans will be a critical thread in negotiations with insurers, giving markets confidence that the company is taking a proactive approach to risk management and revenue protection.

Get clarity on your subsea cable risk exposures

To unlock these core four benefits, project owners and operators need to build the most robust and resilient program. Optimizing cost and coverage will be critical, and it starts with understanding the risk profile, from construction to operation.

Construction phase

Construction phase

Subsea cable manufacturers and installers have full order books with lead times in the region of four years or more.

Most platforms require conversion from DC electricity to AC electricity, which comes at additional costs and question marks over return on investment.

One of the terminations is likely to be a dynamic cable. Dynamic cables are less proven technology and are subject to environmental forces and the risk of failure becomes higher.

It is likely the power cable will cross many pipelines and fiber-optic cables of third parties, cable crossings and creating additional liability exposures.

Operational phase

Operational phase

In connecting electrified platforms to an existing grid, there are more single points of failure. If an asset in the electrification network goes down, the disruption could be significant.

Operators are reliant on the construction phase being completed to a high standard. Faulty equipment or technology can create operational failures, with disruption extending beyond 90 days in some cases as vessels and repair crews are in high demand.

Operating more specialist equipment needs more specialist skills and attracting and retaining critical talent is a core issue. Without a skilled and trained workforce, the risk of failure, and disruption to operations and revenue flow, increases.

Key actions to optimize your approach to subsea cable risk

  • Assess infrastructure needs: Evaluate existing infrastructure and identify opportunities for electrification using subsea cables.
  • Collaborate with stakeholders: Engage with grid operators, policymakers and technology providers to develop collaborative investment models and policy frameworks.
  • Use data to bring risk and finance together in decision-making: Conduct risk engineering studies to model potential loss scenarios, and harness sophisticated analytical models such as Connected Risk Intelligence[1] to establish the optimal balance of cost and coverage.
  • Use loss trends to bolster risk finance decisions: Risk profiles are relatively niche compared to those in traditional portfolios, so when losses come through, the reaction from the market is usually more volatile. But where loss data is scarcer for newer electrification projects, historic losses relating to existing dynamic technologies could help to model the loss likelihood, severity, and cost.

Subsea cables’ installation and maintenance require ongoing technological innovation and strategic management. But for energy companies that make the right risk decisions, backed by data, the opportunities to build a cleaner operating model can be substantial.

Contact our sector-focused specialists to find out how your business can supercharge your electrification strategy.

Footnote

  1. Connected Risk Intelligence Return to article

Energy Market Review 2025

Title File Type File Size
Energy Market Review 2025 PDF 6.2 MB

Authors


Head of Energy Transition and Development, Natural Resources
email Email

Executive Director Claims, United Kingdom, Natural Resources
email Email

Natural resources contacts


Global Head of Natural Resources
email Email

Henrik Brune
Nordic Head of Renewable Energy Marine and Offshore Energy, Natural Resources
email Email

Sofia Hedberg
Client Executive & Practice leader Property
email Email

Contact us